| Donna | 01-25-2007 13:40 [E,W] | | This is an iconic, arresting image...but the type treatment is a bit goofy and devalidates the horror of the poster. | | Laurie | 02-14-2007 11:37 [E,W] | | why would anyone want to buy a poster depicting a dead child buried in leaves? I think that's sick. | | Barbara Phillips | 02-22-2007 16:48 [E,W] | | I think this is an awful poster protraying the double initial murders of 3 little girls. I am from and still live in and around Rochester, ny. I was the same age and went to the same school as one of the girls. That was a horible tragady and death of 3 little girls, and to sell such a poster showing the death of one of them is awful. Even if its not the real body. Tasteless. | | Tyler | 07-16-2007 15:06 [E,W] | | I think the poster is good. Who cares if it shows a dead girl? That is what the movie is about and it IS a gritty movie. It isn't a fairy tell where we see bland pictures of the cast. Get over it! | | steve | 03-04-2008 11:34 [E,W] | | I think it looks great, exactly what a serial killer movie poster should look like, I agree that its not a bland cast pic, although Eliza Dushku is easy on the eye | | Suss | 12-05-2007 09:02 [E,W] | | The print, over all, has a sort of ''cookie-cutter'' execution- done a zillion times over...forgetable. The image concept is equally unimaginative. I get the feeling that whoever was tasked to do this never got a good inspiration to start with and then tried to come up with anything that would ''do''. There must be a dozen ways to stir a better reaction from the viewer, even using the same elements. The trailer, on the other hand, is much better. | | Moonyk | 09-06-2008 11:15 [E,W] | | I do like the poster, simple and effective. It's just a movie, why makes such a fuss. Also, the color and the black eye looks nice. |
|
