| Michael | 06-19-2007 16:41 [E,W] | | Very odd how they have used a photo from Jessica's Rolling Stone shoot from 2005. Did they just look through a load of Jessica pics and pick the one that had her in underwear? Lame. And the design is horrible, imagery tells us nothing about the movie. Pretty pointless poster really isn't it. | | Donal | 09-28-2007 13:07 [E,W] | | It is funny the way people who didn't create the poster assume they know exactly how and why it looks the way it looks. The shot of Jessica was actually taken by the head of Lionsgate’s marketing at a photoshoot in late July of this year. The concept is based on an actual scene in the film that truly displays the personalities of the two lead characters. She is a bit shy and awkward. He is smug and self-assured (much like the author of the above comments). | | MBP | 12-03-2007 02:23 [E,W] | | Indeed, who wants a poster that tells you EVERYTHING that's going to happen? The poster, and (usually not) the trailer, ought to simply anticipate what happens - not tell you everything about. They want you to see the movie. |
|
