I feel like we're missing something here. What could it be. Oh right, THE MAIN VILLAIN. HELLO. Pretty bland as a poster, and a little lopsided, but you'd think they would remember something like WHIPLASH. Also Tony Stark is technically on the poster in three places.
J.A.
''It's so bad'' or ''This is awful'' isn't particularly descriptive. Try ''There's too much black space between each of the characters'' or ''There's no particular impact or flare to this poster. Pretty dull.''
boehmaaa!!!!!
well the clouds are there because they would look lame to be honest because those two suits are not standing side by side or anything
el chupa negra
Looks like a film about postal workers fighting robots.
jclayman
anybody else noticed how they are highlighting Johansen's enormous Bumm. Whats up with that.
John
I enjoy the symmetry of the poster. Its great. Color is a little bland. But overall great.
Evan Waters
I kinda like this. A bit busy, but evokes the first while promising a darker tone.
Darkness
it's so bad...
vargucci
ouch.
Tamsin
Looks just like the first poster.
Clark Bran
Bringing traditional back! High fives all around.
Jay
I love this one because it keeps the style of the first one...and says that this one will have more
Mehdi
Much better than the international poster, i like this one.
movieman602
Ok, I've got to admit, that's a pretty sweet poster.
Mel
Is Mickey Rourke that ugly that his face cant appear on any poster of the movies he is in?
Even when the poster is just floating heads like this or Sin City... Wait, the poster of the Wrestler was a close shot of Mickey Rourke... wait, no.
jclayman
Just goes to show not everything BLT touches is Gold. Stinker. PEEE-EEEEEW!
perry
theatrical key art is officially dead
Darkness
Worst poster 2010.
Worst poster ever.
Just bad.
thetruth201
This is Beyond Awful..The Colors are all over the place almost as bad as the lighting. At least try and put some thought into it..And why are there clouds in the corner and no where else?